Untitled

A source of income for Palestinian lands: What the ICC decision has to do with it?

It's not a coincidence that Mass Media all over the world, has spreaded the opportunistic bullshit about UNRWA workers. The very same Media founded and sponsored by the Zionist allied with Netanyahu regime.

So suspicious and timely precise if we have account that it comes exactly from the interested part and just few hours later than the ICC declared its interest in considering all the proofs and allegations presented by the South African delegation at the international criminal court.

Unbelievable, in the other hand, that certain countries could be manipulated with such a , bad- orchestrated, vulgar and law trick, as lack of imagination as plenty of malice : so at an Israel's style. Despicable.

As Mahatma Ghandi once said: "there's no more cruel method of violence than powerty" and that's exactly what Israel does to Palestinians: to press their decision making process by starving them; to make them turn against the resistance groups that protect them and dignify their existence : the ones that genuinely share with them a common aim for their territory and for having a peaceful and prosperous existence ; the ones that face directly and confront bravely the tyranny of Israel, so in opposite to the genocidal project of the latest, that perpetrates a mass murder just for the shake of the lands they will wish to own.

It's so evilish and a legal suppose to be considered as an accomplished of war crime to deny help and protection to Palestinians precisely know, that are adding to their suffering for the loss of possessions and territories for decades, the abhorrent attacks and extreme violence of the latest months .

I remain you, that you all have the duty of care and each individual State has the responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnically cleansing, etc.

Rule 55: 'The parties to the conflict must allow and facilitate rapid and unimpeded passage of humanitarian relief for civilians in need, which is impartial in character and conducted without any adverse distinction, and provided on the basis of need alone"

For example, under Article 27 of the Fourth Geneva Convention (What is Article 27 of the Geneva Convention?): [..] "protected persons are entitled, in all circumstances, to respect for their persons, their honor, their family rights, their religious convictions and practices, and their manners and customs [...]

What about avoiding the distribution of Humanitarian Aid within the occupied territories ?

Article 61 - Relief III.

"The Occupying Power shall facilitate the rapid distribution of these consignments. All Contracting Parties shall endeavour to permit the transit and transport, free of charge, of such relief consignments on their way to occupied territories "

Obviously a war criminal will illegally deny this humanitarian right described in the Geneva Convention as much as war criminals accomplished countries will contribute for this abhorrent goal to be achieved.

As a conclusion, all the countries retiring their UMWRA contributions for the relief of Palestinians as a first measure to support their current situation can be legally considered as war criminal's accomplishment, as far as, implicated parties, have disobeyed and disconsidered all rules contemplated within the international law concerning these kind of conflict situations

What is the crime of complicity in genocide?

The crime of complicity in genocide captures a class of perpetrators broader than those implicated by aiding and abetting the crime of genocide. This is a distinction seemingly recognized by the drafters of the Genocide Convention and of the ICTY and ICTR Statutes.

And what a Genocide according the international law?

What is Article 6 of the Genocide Convention?

Article 6 - Genocide

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

What is Article 17 of the European Convention on Human Rights?

Everyone has the right to own, use, dispose of and bequeath his or her lawfully acquired possessions. No one may be deprived of his or her possessions, except in the public interest and in the cases and under the conditions provided for by law, subject to fair compensation being paid in good time for their loss.

And many, many more....

So for this reasons among others I remain all the countries that have decided to retire their apportations to UMWRA their legal duties and I reconsider their obligations to others, for their own shake, now that you're at time

Thank you