1776-THE DUBIOUS CONSTITUTIONALITY OF AN IMPEACHMENT PROCESS AND TRIAL OF A PRESIDENT NOT AT CHARGE

Are we truly assisting to an impeachment process to a President who isn’t at charge in this very moment?- Is it really allowed by this chart or are we witnessing a deploy of a complot to discredit and dishonor the former President?- Let me remind you the legal basement of my exposition on the first Amendment of the mentioned Constitution, and why the facts developed on the 6-7th of January are just a pretext to set aside Donald Trump, definitely from politics. As Follows:

“The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws which regulate an establishment of religion, or that would prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights “

Starting by the facts, that the freedom of speech of Mr Trump has been repeteadly and constantly infringed by press and public media with a total, absolute, blatant and arbitrary “decision making parallel process” ( by introducing rude comments, “cutting off “ of full parts of interventions “on air”, etc, etc) exerted on their own, by certain sites and media, without any consequences for them, the same amendment allows, literally:

“[...] the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances” [...]

And exactly this, is what could be perfectly happening in the sorrounding gardens of the Capitol, the day of the facts, on 6-7h of January: riots of angry citizens, in absolutely disagreement for the votation results, decided to gather in front of the Capitol to exert a Constitutional Right, granted by the first Amendment. Now, to dirime if the convulsions produced during the protest, where just a mere result of an own mass psicological effect or directly influenced from any flamed part of Mr Donald Trump speech, is just a point to analyze it, itself. Anyway, and before “ shelling to crumbles” this content, should be interesting, as well, to have account, if the legal mechanism to use as a “ corrective” to Mr Trump, if it could be finally proved that he was, somehow, responsible for the Capitol revolts, is this “ grotesque impeachment” and “ particular process” with all its subsequent paraphernalia.

As it would be to long, and full content is public and at everybody’s disposal on the net ( or, am I wrong and there’re certain webs that has deleted it ?-That’s what I call “Democracy “) I will refere just to this significative “requirements” to take it as an example, as I couldn’t extract any other shows of guiltiness on that speech.

If from the applying to the citizenry to exert those rights: to protest at the capitol, to demonstrate, as a way to show a shared discontent with National Elections results , we have to make the inference that he was inciting or promoting massive riots or violent revolts, Americans, you have a problem inside your own 1776 Constitution or, maybe, your first Amendment should be questioned, judged and removed, for involving an implicit call to rebellion and/ or insurrection, whoever dares to compel others to apply to these rights.